Everything about Register Linguistics totally explained
In
linguistics, a
register is a subset of a
language used for a particular purpose or in a particular social setting. For example, an
English speaker may adhere more closely to
prescribed grammar, pronounce words ending in -ing with a
velar nasal (for example "walking", not "walkin'") and refrain from using the word "
ain't" when speaking in a formal setting, but the same person could violate all of these prescriptions in an informal setting.
The term was first used by the linguist
Thomas Bertram Reid in
1956, and brought into general currency in the
1960s by a group of linguists who wanted to distinguish between variations in language according to the
user (defined by variables such as social background, geography, sex and age), and variations according to
use, "in the sense that each speaker has a range of varieties and choices between them at different times" (Halliday et al, 1964). The focus is on the way language is used in particular situations, such as
legalese or
motherese, the language of a biology research lab, of a news report or of the bedroom.
Halliday (1964) identifies three variables that determine register: field (the subject matter of the discourse),
tenor (the participants and their relationships) and mode (the channel of communication, for example spoken or written). Any or all of the elements of language may vary in different registers —
vocabulary,
syntax,
phonology,
morphology,
pragmatic rules or different
prosodic features such as pitch, volume and
intonation in spoken English, or size and speed of sign production in a
sign language. Registers often also have non-linguistic prescriptions such as appropriate
dress codes,
body language, and
proximity of speakers to one another.
As with other types of
language variation, we tend to find register continua rather than discrete varieties — there's an endless number of registers we could identify, with no clear boundaries. Discourse categorisation is a complex problem, and even in the general definition of "register" given above (language variation defined by use not user), there are cases where other kinds of language variation, such as regional or age dialect, overlap. As a result of this complexity, there's far from consensus about the meanings of terms like "register","field" or "tenor"; different writers' definitions of these terms are often in direct contradiction of each other. Additional terms such as
diatype,
genre,
text type,
style,
acrolect,
mesolect and
basilect among many others may be used to cover the same or similar ground. Some prefer to restrict the domain of the term "register" to a specific vocabulary (Wardhaugh, 1986) (which one might commonly call
jargon), while others argue against the use of the term altogether. These various approaches with their own "register" or set of terms and meanings fall under disciplines such as
sociolinguistics,
stylistics,
pragmatics or
systemic functional grammar.
Register as formality scale
One of the most analysed areas where the use of language is determined by the situation is the formality scale. Writers (especially in
language teaching) have often used the term "register" as shorthand for formal/informal style, although this is an aging definition. Linguistics textbooks may use the term "tenor" instead (Halliday 1978), but increasingly prefer the term "style" — "we characterise styles as varieties of language viewed from the point of view of formality" (Trudgill, 1992) — while defining "registers" more narrowly as specialist language use related to a particular activity, such as academic jargon. There is very little agreement as to how the spectrum of formality should be divided.
Formality scale>
| Very formal, Frozen, Rigid |
← FORMAL |
Neutral |
INFORMAL → |
Very informal, Casual, Familiar |
This diagram is from Quirk et al (1985), who use the term attitude rather than style or register>
In one prominent model, Joos (1961) describes five styles in spoken English:
- Frozen: Printed unchanging language such as bible quotations; often contains archaisms.
- Formal: One-way participation, no interruption. Technical vocabulary; "Fussy semantics" or exact definitions are important. Includes introductions between strangers.
- Consultative: Two-way participation. Background information is provided — prior knowledge isn't assumed. "Backchannel behaviour" such as "uh huh", "I see", etc. is common. Interruptions allowed.
- Casual: In-group friends and acquaintances. No background information provided. Ellipsis and slang common. Interruptions common.
- Intimate: Non-public. Intonation more important than wording or grammar. Private vocabulary.
Further Information
Get more info on 'Register Linguistics'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://register__linguistics.totallyexplained.com">Register (linguistics) Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |